Suspension revoked following ICC report; reassignment sparks debate over accountability in police ranks
Deputy Inspector General (DIG) D. Magesh Kumar, who had been suspended earlier this year over allegations of sexual harassment, has been reinstated and posted as DIG of the Coastal Security Group in Chennai. His suspension was officially lifted in April 2025, after an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) report found no grounds for further disciplinary action, following a conciliation process.
Background: Allegation and Suspension
DIG Kumar was suspended in February 2025 after a woman traffic constable accused him of sexual and physical harassment during his tenure as Joint Commissioner of Police (North), Greater Chennai Police. A departmental inquiry was initiated under the orders of Tamil Nadu Director General of Police (DGP) Shankar Jiwal, and Kumar was placed in Vacancy Reserve at the DGP’s office during the investigation.
Counter-Complaint and ICC Findings
During the investigation, Kumar’s wife—herself a former sub-inspector—filed a counter-complaint, alleging that the woman constable had attempted to extort ₹25 lakh and fabricated the charges. CCTV footage was reportedly submitted as part of their defense.
In accordance with Vishaka Guidelines, a committee chaired by DGP Seema Agarwal was constituted to investigate the case. The ICC ultimately concluded that there was insufficient evidence to warrant disciplinary action. The matter was closed following a conciliation process.
Reposting and Response
Following the clearance by the ICC, Kumar has now resumed official duties as DIG, Coastal Security Group, replacing R. Jayanthi, who has been transferred as DIG, Technical Services, Chennai.
The reinstatement has generated mixed reactions. While some officials see it as a procedural outcome based on the committee’s report, others have expressed concern over transparency and the robustness of institutional safeguards in cases involving allegations of sexual misconduct within the police force.
Broader Concerns Over Institutional Accountability
The reassignment has reignited conversations around workplace harassment mechanisms within uniformed services. Critics have raised questions about the independence of internal inquiry bodies, potential pressure on complainants, and the broader impact such cases have on encouraging women to come forward.
Legal experts and women’s rights activists are calling for reforms including independent oversight of internal investigations, more transparent procedures, and stronger protections for complainants—especially in high-profile cases involving senior officers.
